Thread Info
  • State Suggested Answer
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 61 replies
  • Answers 2 answers
  • Subscribers 13 subscribers
  • Views 201891 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Forum for HA and Autoscaling UTM deployments @ AWS?

lprikockis

I feel like it would be beneficial to have a separate sub-forum specifically for discussing UTM deployments in the AWS environment.  Particularly for those of us working on getting the HA and/or Autoscaling implementations to work properly.  While the webpage here: www.sophos.com/aws seems to suggest that AWS integration is a widely used and perfectly tuned feature of the UTM, those of us who have been tinkering around with it know that Sophos still has a ways to go in ramping up their own internal expertise and supporting documentation for this use-case.    All the more reason for easy channels for collaboration among the community.

At the very least, I'd love to hear from anyone else out there who's currently working with the HA implementation.  I'm alternately impressed and frustrated with it thus far :)  but I think it could be a truly amazing product with a bit more fine tuning-- and I think strong community involvement is going to be the driving force to make that happen.  



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
  • 0 in reply to RichVorwaller

    So yesterday I finally upgraded one of our UTMs to the newest 9.407-3 version.  I thought I would investigate this conversion utility further since the last time I looked at it was July (see above in this thread).   One would logically think that if including it prematurely before was a mistake (again, see earlier in this thread), if they hadn't removed it in the intervening versions then presumably they fixed/finished the functionality.

    Nope :(

     

    Unexpected error in aws_convert_to_deployment: No such file or directory at /usr/local/ap510/site/lib/IPC/Run3.pm line 426.

     

    To me, that just seems sloppy and unprofessional to not only have a much touted feature fail, but fail in such an ugly way.  So I opened a support case and was told:

    "There will be an upcoming release to address the below source for the error message.  
    Other alternatives are deploy using a Cloud formation template for either a HA or AS configuration. "

     

    So basically, despite the fancy UI, this feature is still completely unusable and the only option is to hack around with CF templates and try to get something working that way... last I checked though, the CF templates provided created a whole new VPC (https://community.sophos.com/kb/en-US/122742) so that's not really much of an option for dealing with an existing environment that you want to upgrade.

    If this were a free piece of software created by volunteers then I could understand this, but how does a supposedly "Enterprise" piece of commercial software get released with such a glaring flaw?

  • 0 in reply to lprikockis

    Hi lprikockis,

    Thanks for your feedback. Completely understand your frustration. As we mentioned in a previous post, the UI utility was released prematurely. To remove it would have caused some additional problems for the release, so we decided to leave it in as with the message that is was not yet available. However, no excuses. We want to provide a better experience for our customers, and appreciate your points. We're working on getting this fixed in our next release.

    Can you email us your support case ID? I'd like to review the case and possibly your logs to make sure our next release will indeed address the problem you reported. Please reach out to aws.marketplace@sophos.com.

    Thanks again.

    Rich Vorwaller

    Product Manager, Sophos IaaS

  • 0 in reply to lprikockis

    Hi lprikockis

     

    I am part of the development team working on this feature at Sophos.

     

    Could you please provide us with the confd.log (Configuration Daemon) of the time you tried the conversion and the error message appeared?

     

    Unfortunately we have have not published the update path yet, but we are working on that at the moment.

     

    Would you also be interested in doing kind of a beta tester for it?

  • 0 in reply to Sebastian Poehn

    no problem... happy to provide the confd.log file and I'd also be willing to be a beta tester of this feature... I definitely would love to see it working.

  • 0 in reply to RichVorwaller

    RichVorwaller said:

    To remove it would have caused some additional problems for the release, so we decided to leave it in as with the message that is was not yet available.

    I can understand the difficulty of backing out the change completely, but I certainly didn't see any "message that it was not yet available".   Couldn't some note to that effect be added to the text on that screen so that at least there was no expectation that it would work?

  • 0 in reply to lprikockis

    Hi lprikockis

     

    Good news. We can reproduce your problem. Thanks a lot for the confd.log.

    You are running a "Auto Scaling" ami (image name starts with something like axg9400_aws-asg-9.406)?

    The conversion feature is only supported for our standalone ami.

    So try to launch one of those:

    https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B00DJDRZB2

    And the error message should be gone (instead you will get the message saying there is no update path yet).

    If you reach that step, please PM me and I will give you instructions on how to use the conversion as a beta user.

     

    Thanks a lot for your help, and discovering this bug

  • 0 in reply to Sebastian Poehn

    Hmmm... I'm not sure what AMI it is since all I get from AWS is:   "Cannot load details for ami-3ec9a957. You may not be permitted to view it."

    However, this particular instance was first launched in December 2014, so I doubt it was the auto-scaling AMI as that didn't exist at the time.

    When I have a moment, I'll try launching a standalone instance in a test VPC and confirm that I get the appropriate message.

     

    I seems like what this is pointing to is the fact that folks with older versions that have been upgraded to the latest firmware without a completely new relaunch from a recent AMI may not be able to use this "automated" conversion path.   So if I need to launch an entirely new instance, shouldn't there be some way to just launch the HA version in my current VPC and then load the saved configuration?    It seems a little weird to have to create a "new" standalone AMI UTM just for the purpose of "automatically" converting it to the HA version.

  • 0 in reply to lprikockis

    Can you provide us the output of 'version' in bash?

     

    The idea of conversion is to convert single instances into HA or Auto Scaling setups. In your case you already have a Auto Scaling setup (probably spawned without CloudFormation and only one instance), so there is no need to use the conversion right there.

  • 0 in reply to Sebastian Poehn

    loginuser@qcpfw:/home/login > version

    Current software version...: 9.407003
    Hardware type..............: Software Appliance
    Installation image.........: 9.000-8.1
    Installation type..........: asg
    Installed pattern version..: 111918
    Downloaded pattern version.: 111918
    Up2Dates applied...........: 59 (see below)
    sys-9.000-9.001-8.18.1.tgz (Mar 6 2013)
    sys-9.001-9.002-18.12.1.tgz (Mar 6 2013)
    sys-9.002-9.003-12.15.1.tgz (Mar 6 2013)
    sys-9.003-9.003-15.16.4.tgz (Mar 6 2013)
    sys-9.003-9.004-15.33.1.tgz (Mar 7 2013)
    sys-9.004-9.004-33.34.1.tgz (Mar 25 2013)
    sys-9.004-9.005-29.15.2.tgz (Mar 25 2013)
    sys-9.005-9.005-15.16.1.tgz (Mar 25 2013)
    sys-9.005-9.006-15.5.2.tgz (Apr 5 2013)
    sys-9.006-9.100-5.16.1.tgz (May 13 2013)
    sys-9.100-9.101-16.12.1.tgz (Jun 13 2013)
    sys-9.101-9.102-11.8.2.tgz (Aug 9 2013)
    sys-9.102-9.103-8.5.2.tgz (Aug 19 2013)
    sys-9.103-9.104-5.17.2.tgz (Aug 19 2013)
    sys-9.104-9.105-17.9.1.tgz (Sep 3 2013)
    sys-9.105-9.106-9.17.1.tgz (Nov 4 2013)
    sys-9.106-9.107-17.33.2.tgz (Mar 9 2014)
    sys-9.107-9.108-33.23.2.tgz (Mar 9 2014)
    sys-9.108-9.109-23.1.2.tgz (Mar 9 2014)
    sys-9.109-9.110-1.22.1.tgz (Apr 10 2014)
    sys-9.110-9.111-22.7.1.tgz (Apr 10 2014)
    sys-9.111-9.111-7.11.1.tgz (May 28 2014)
    sys-9.111-9.112-7.12.1.tgz (Jun 26 2014)
    sys-9.112-9.113-12.1.2.tgz (Jun 26 2014)
    sys-9.113-9.203-1.3.1.tgz (Aug 7 2014)
    sys-9.203-9.204-3.20.1.tgz (Aug 7 2014)
    sys-9.204-9.205-20.12.1.tgz (Dec 17 2014)
    sys-9.205-9.206-12.35.1.tgz (Dec 17 2014)
    sys-9.206-9.207-35.19.2.tgz (Dec 17 2014)
    sys-9.207-9.208-19.8.5.tgz (Dec 17 2014)
    sys-9.208-9.209-8.8.1.tgz (Dec 17 2014)
    sys-9.209-9.210-8.20.1.tgz (Dec 17 2014)
    sys-9.210-9.304-20.9.2.tgz (Dec 18 2014)
    sys-9.304-9.305-9.4.1.tgz (Dec 18 2014)
    sys-9.305-9.306-4.6.1.tgz (Feb 5 2016)
    sys-9.306-9.307-6.6.1.tgz (Feb 5 2016)
    sys-9.307-9.308-6.16.2.tgz (Feb 6 2016)
    sys-9.308-9.309-16.3.1.tgz (Feb 6 2016)
    sys-9.309-9.310-3.11.1.tgz (Feb 6 2016)
    sys-9.310-9.311-11.3.1.tgz (Feb 6 2016)
    sys-9.311-9.312-3.8.1.tgz (Feb 6 2016)
    sys-9.312-9.313-8.3.1.tgz (Feb 6 2016)
    sys-9.313-9.314-3.13.1.tgz (Feb 6 2016)
    sys-9.314-9.315-13.2.1.tgz (Feb 6 2016)
    sys-9.315-9.316-2.4.1.tgz (Feb 6 2016)
    sys-9.316-9.317-4.5.1.tgz (Feb 6 2016)
    sys-9.317-9.318-5.5.2.tgz (Feb 6 2016)
    sys-9.318-9.350-5.12.1.tgz (Feb 6 2016)
    sys-9.350-9.351-12.3.2.tgz (Feb 6 2016)
    sys-9.351-9.352-3.6.2.tgz (Feb 6 2016)
    sys-9.352-9.353-6.4.1.tgz (Feb 6 2016)
    sys-9.353-9.354-4.4.1.tgz (Apr 7 2016)
    sys-9.354-9.355-4.1.1.tgz (Apr 7 2016)
    sys-9.355-9.356-1.3.1.tgz (Oct 25 03:03)
    sys-9.356-9.357-3.1.4.tgz (Oct 25 03:04)
    sys-9.357-9.404-1.5.3.tgz (Oct 25 03:09)
    sys-9.404-9.405-5.5.1.tgz (Oct 25 03:11)
    sys-9.405-9.406-5.3.1.tgz (Oct 25 03:12)
    sys-9.406-9.407-3.3.1.tgz (Oct 25 03:15)
    Up2Dates available.........: 0
    Factory resets.............: 0
    Timewarps detected.........: 0

  • 0 in reply to lprikockis

    Thanks. I tried to reproduce your problem but for me everything works.

     

    The update path you went through looks valid.

     

    Did you do any modification to the machine like doing file manipulation in bash or manual patching?

     

Unfiltered HTML