Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 13 replies
  • Subscribers 2 subscribers
  • Views 9638 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Problems with RED QoS

pmcdaniel
We have an ASG220 at our main office on a 6M/6M connections and the RED device at a remote office on a 1.5M/1.5M connection.  Our highest priority service is VOIP, which we are using a DSCP tag of 46 to mark the VOIP packets.

Outbound QoS form the ASG220 WAN interface seems to be working fine.

The issue is the traffic inbound from the RED.  If we enable QoS on the RED interface, the bandwidth for all services instantly gets cut in half or worse, even before we setup any selectors or pools.


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
  • 0
    Yes, that is correct.  RED Management>>Device Configuration can be IP or hostname.  I thought you were suggesting changing the hostname of the Astaro box at Management>>System Settings>>Hostname Tab, which should be an FQDN only.

    You think we got it?  Ready to deploy that second WAN?  [:)]
    __________________
    ACE v8/SCA v9.3

    ...still have a v5 install disk in a box somewhere.

    http://xkcd.com
    http://www.tedgoff.com/mb
    http://www.projectcartoon.com/cartoon/1
  • 0
    Pmcdaniel, did you actually solve your issue by adding that second WAN Interface to split the traffic? Same Situation here: 2 Tagged VLANs over one RED-Tunnel, working fine, but with bad voicequality/connection drops on the way from the RED to our ASG.
  • 0
    Hi, StadtOHZ, and welcome to the User BB!

    You might also look in the Intrusion Prevention log to see if there isn't a false-positive for UDP Flooding.

    Cheers - Bob
     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
Unfiltered HTML