Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 12 replies
  • Subscribers 5 subscribers
  • Views 23630 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

UTM: DKIM & DMARC what are you guys doing??

twister5800

Hi,

Apparently the UTM cannot do DMARC, allthough there are feature requests for it.

But do to the CEO fraud, and PCI Compliance, more and more companies (customers) are getting a low score, due to this, and cannot understand, why this perfect NSG cannot do this.

I am having a hard time explaining, as I come to the part now, where I do not understand it either :-)

So for the time being, how do you guys solve theese requirements today?

Using 3.party antispam soulution/provider??

Appliance with ASSP? :-)

Would be great to hear / share some good ideas :-)



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
  • 0 in reply to twister5800

    I am surprised that an auditor is requiting these features.

    You can use more than one spam filter.  The data analysis limitations of UTM Spam filter would trouble me if it was the only one that I was using.   I use it behind a pre-existing spam filter, and UTM catches stuff that the other device misses.  So if they buy one for DMarc, they can still use UTM as well.

  • 0 in reply to DouglasFoster

    There are different degrees of auditors :-D

    Two antispam solutions is also a working solution, but primarily I am the fan of just one :-)

    -----

    Best regards
    Martin

    Sophos XGS 2100 @ Home | Sophos v20 Technician

Unfiltered HTML