This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

UTM Up2Date 9.506 Released

9.506 is released.

Maybe we could use this thread for reporting successful updated system and maybe not so many bugs. Who wants to be first to update? :-)



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
  • See my command line solution to selecting a specific AD server for SMTP recipient authentication.

    Cheers - Bob

     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
  • reverted back from the 9.506 Update twice now after running into problems on my home machine.

    Yesterday while out i couldn't connect via VPN and WAF was down aswell. When i got back home i found that the WAF was running on 100% CPU and Log was "running wild" + File System becoming read-only.

    I am switching out hardware now to rule out any possibility of an error on that side. With 9.505-4 it has been running stable for a while now.

    ---

    Sophos UTM 9.3 Certified Engineer

  • Upgraded my production environment from 9.505-4 to 9.506-2. 2 x SG330 physical appliances in Active/Active cluster. Upgrade was successful, AD authentication working fine, no issues discovered so far (3 days). Not using WAF.

  • Just what I was looking for. I would prefer that we could set it per Virtual Web Server as before. Having it be a global setting makes all of the WAF servers insecure vs the one that still need to provide downlevel support.

     

    Eliminating 1.0 prevented users on Android versions lower than 4.4 unable to connect to our systems. It also an older .net app we were using, but that needed to be remediated anyways. Still would have been nice to see a little bit more explanation around the changes in the change log. This entry in the release notes is a bit vague, not indicating the changes:

     

    NUTM-8806 [WAF] Issue with TLS settings for virtual webserver

  • Rant begin:

    I asked Support for more detail about a couple of these "Nutn" entries in the release notes and all they could do is point me back to the release notes.  

    In a year or two, perhaps details will appear in the known issues list for this release, since the K.I.L. never seems to have current data.

    Sophos does not seem to nderstand what a system manager needs and expects in a  release notes document.

    Rant End