Did you follow the instructions from Patman93? When you connect to the UTM console, and list the certificate properties, it should look as if 2 certificates have been concatenated into a single certificate.
-------------------------------
Interesting [in-ter-uh-sting, -truh-sting, -tuh-res-ting]
A word typically used by IT technicians to describe an issue they didn't expect, or never encountered, and don't know how to fix.
Hi candal02, I would totally do that, but we are using a UTM9, which warranty would be voided as soon as I do changes as root from shell.
I can't be the only one having that issue on a SophoS box, not being able to change that because of warranty?
Ah yes. Although I haven't confirmed with Sophos myself, I don't believe that making changes to your certificate as root through the SSH console would void your warranty. That's the only change this solution has you doing through the shell. You aren't changing any other files. But you make a very good point. I recommend you open a ticket with Sophos support, tell them exactly what you want to do, and ask them to officially confirm or deny if doing it would void your warranty.
You definitely are NOT the only one having this issue. But so far this solution is the only one I have discovered that works. It would indeed be very disappointing if this voids your warranty. If you do find out the answer, would you mind posting it?
-------------------------------
Interesting [in-ter-uh-sting, -truh-sting, -tuh-res-ting]
A word typically used by IT technicians to describe an issue they didn't expect, or never encountered, and don't know how to fix.
You are exactly right. You have done nothing wrong. This is a known bug in UTM.
I opened a support ticket, which was escalated to Level 2. This is a portion of his response:
"This behavior on the Webadmin / User Portal is known to us and is being looked at by Dev."
He proposed a workaround, which involves manipulating .pem files with OpenSSL and then using ssh to replace a certificates in a key folder.
I had some concerns about implementing his suggestion, and the ticket was closed because I did not follow up in a timely manner.
I was not too worried about it because I had only seen the problem using the SSL Labs tester, not an actual browser.
Since you report that Apple systems will be more particular, I will need to reopen the issue with Sophos.
However, I don't think Sophos would appreciate a minimally-supported hack being re-posted to this forum, so I will not post the fix even if I get it working.
I recommend pursuing this with Sophos Support, realizing that you will need to claw your way to Level 2.
The fix has already been discovered and posted in this thread by Robert Yount on Oct 7 2016, unfortunately it doesn't survive a reboot of the UTM. If there's another way that persists after reboots, I think it would be useful to share for others. I ended up just throwing the webadmin & portal behind HAProxy which handles the TLS termination of my other sites.
The fix posted by PaTmaN93 earlier in this thread survives a reboot. I have tested and confirmed this is true. We are now waiting to hear back to see if this fix invalidates the warranty on your UTM.
-------------------------------
Interesting [in-ter-uh-sting, -truh-sting, -tuh-res-ting]
A word typically used by IT technicians to describe an issue they didn't expect, or never encountered, and don't know how to fix.
Considering that Web Filtering enforces certificate chains very strictly (intermediate certificate required, root certificate not allowed), it blows my mind that UTM server functions cannot get the certificate chain correct. UserPortal/WebAdmin will omit the intermediate certificate, while WAF server will always include the root certificate.
In all the years that this product has been in development by both Astaro and Sophos, has no one ever tested two UTM devices talking to each other, with one running Webfilter functionsand one running UserPortal and WAF functions? If not, why not?
it is a safe bet that if you fiddle with CC, you give them the option of saying that you made a typing mistake while implementing your fix. To avoid the argument, don't tell them what you have done. Level 1 isn't likely to know how to use CC, and Level 2 and higher will hopefully be reasonable.
Just make sure you create & download a backup from the UTM first. There's a procedure to re-image the whole thing just in case.