Every time I am trying to delete a pf rule, I am getting prompted to delete the "unnamed" pf rule object. (network,services and time events work as expected where you get the name object when trying to delete)
Packetfilter- , NAT- and Masqueradingrules don't have a "name" which can be configured. The name of the object is the same as the object id (REF_*********). I think that's why the framework shows "unnamed" when you try to delete them. The same happens if you create a host object without a name. If you try to delete this, then the warning message also says that the object is "unnamed".
We already know about this one. It's a little bit tricky to fix in a general way, because we need to find a good way to find a meaningful description if the object is unnamed.
