Hello!
I need clarification:
If in SFOS the setting of route_precedence is: static, sd-wan, vpn it means that if I have no static routes present, the one that is set in sd-wan applies.
Does the gateway set at the interface (WAN) level fall into static routes? Thank you
Thanks Lucar, I see that document, I wanted to make sure that with the 19 there had not been some changes.
At my home (where I carry out the tests) I have an ADSL connection and a WWAN cellular connection.
Here my Gateway:
Here my NAT Rule
Here My SD-WAN routes
V19 was installed as an upgrade from V18.
I had noticed that the SDWAN rule above was never met (KB counters is 0). That's why of my question in the forum...
Today doing further tests I tried to clone such SDWAN rule (I just changed the name "Gabriele4G" instead of "Gabriele" ) and now it works!
So there seem to be problems with converting SDWAN rules from V18 to V19. I would therefore ask you to check this.
Thanks Lucar, I see that document, I wanted to make sure that with the 19 there had not been some changes.
At my home (where I carry out the tests) I have an ADSL connection and a WWAN cellular connection.
Here my Gateway:
Here my NAT Rule
Here My SD-WAN routes
V19 was installed as an upgrade from V18.
I had noticed that the SDWAN rule above was never met (KB counters is 0). That's why of my question in the forum...
Today doing further tests I tried to clone such SDWAN rule (I just changed the name "Gabriele4G" instead of "Gabriele" ) and now it works!
So there seem to be problems with converting SDWAN rules from V18 to V19. I would therefore ask you to check this.
