Port Renaming not implemented system wide ?

What is the point of renaming a port if it is not carried over system wide. I don't care what my port is called in interfaces if the firewall rule still considers it port1. Totally useless. If this is going to be fixed in a future release then my apologies.

Regards

Bill

Parents

0 Emile Belcourt over 5 years ago

Hello Bill,

This has been pointed out in another thread for the log viewer.

I agree it ahould be system wide, I'd suggest using the feedback button. The places I'd recommend it being system wide are Firewall Rules, Log Viewer and Reports.

Emile
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel

Reply

0 Emile Belcourt over 5 years ago

Hello Bill,

This has been pointed out in another thread for the log viewer.

I agree it ahould be system wide, I'd suggest using the feedback button. The places I'd recommend it being system wide are Firewall Rules, Log Viewer and Reports.

Emile
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel

Children

0 Billybob over 5 years ago in reply to Emile Belcourt

Thanks. About to submit another bug where basically port1 (LAN) in my case is not considered LAN when NAT rules are counted. This whole NAT thing needs a do over.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel