Important note about SSL VPN compatibility for 20.0 MR1 with EoL SFOS versions and UTM9 OS. Learn more in the release notes.

Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 23 replies
  • Subscribers 53 subscribers
  • Views 68259 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

XG firewall, can't say I'm impressed

Sci-Tek

Attempted today to swith out the old UTM with XG firewall (home use). Been using this product since Astaro 4.7 (I think), and loved it since day one.

And I can't really say I'm impressed with XG firewall. The GUI is messy while im sure the touch fanboys will love it, personally I hate it. 

There don't seem to be a option to see live log. It could be that I didn't look good enough tho. 
Country blocking, couldn't get it to work. Don't know if it was even supposed to work. 
Specifying FW rules was horrible. I think I actually prefer Windows firewall rule adding to this. 

Reporting was powerfull and I can see thats a improved area.

Unfortunatley the XG firewall named Batman was decapitaed and nuked from orbit. Atleast I tried and wanted to like it.



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    It took me a long time, but I think I finally got a pretty good handle on the new GUI. I re-created the rules I had running on UTM9, but as soon as I had one client downloading a file the internet was crippled for any other user. (This is home use). One computer downloading a file, ping to Google was 1,200ms, web browsing was painfully slow. I start disabling HTTP(S) scanning, then IPS, and performance improves. The dashboard is showing a performance alert and my system load is 2.0 with NO TRAFFIC running through the box at all. This is on the same hardware I was running UTM9 on with no issues. I can download a file, stream HD netflix, surf the web, and play a multiplayer video game with no issues on UTM9. I went back to UTM9. Hopefully they fix the performance issues. I'm not sure if the 4-core limit doesn't play well with my 8 core Intel Atom C2750? Is the Sophos XG Linux kernel 64-bit? I didn't think to check before I re-installed UTM9.
  • 0 in reply to 0xDECAFBAD

    0xDECAFBAD said:
    It took me a long time, but I think I finally got a pretty good handle on the new GUI. I re-created the rules I had running on UTM9, but as soon as I had one client downloading a file the internet was crippled for any other user. (This is home use). One computer downloading a file, ping to Google was 1,200ms, web browsing was painfully slow. I start disabling HTTP(S) scanning, then IPS, and performance improves. The dashboard is showing a performance alert and my system load is 2.0 with NO TRAFFIC running through the box at all. This is on the same hardware I was running UTM9 on with no issues. I can download a file, stream HD netflix, surf the web, and play a multiplayer video game with no issues on UTM9. I went back to UTM9. Hopefully they fix the performance issues. I'm not sure if the 4-core limit doesn't play well with my 8 core Intel Atom C2750? Is the Sophos XG Linux kernel 64-bit? I didn't think to check before I re-installed UTM9.

    XG is limited to 6 gigs of ram and 4 cores.  With you running an atom you had your total processing power cut in half so you are going to have issues.  XG is a 64 bit kernel.

    Owner:  Emmanuel Technology Consulting

    http://etc-md.com

    Former Sophos SG(Astaro) advocate/researcher/Silver Partner

    PfSense w/Suricata, ntopng, 

    Other addons to follow

Reply
  • 0 in reply to 0xDECAFBAD

    0xDECAFBAD said:
    It took me a long time, but I think I finally got a pretty good handle on the new GUI. I re-created the rules I had running on UTM9, but as soon as I had one client downloading a file the internet was crippled for any other user. (This is home use). One computer downloading a file, ping to Google was 1,200ms, web browsing was painfully slow. I start disabling HTTP(S) scanning, then IPS, and performance improves. The dashboard is showing a performance alert and my system load is 2.0 with NO TRAFFIC running through the box at all. This is on the same hardware I was running UTM9 on with no issues. I can download a file, stream HD netflix, surf the web, and play a multiplayer video game with no issues on UTM9. I went back to UTM9. Hopefully they fix the performance issues. I'm not sure if the 4-core limit doesn't play well with my 8 core Intel Atom C2750? Is the Sophos XG Linux kernel 64-bit? I didn't think to check before I re-installed UTM9.

    XG is limited to 6 gigs of ram and 4 cores.  With you running an atom you had your total processing power cut in half so you are going to have issues.  XG is a 64 bit kernel.

    Owner:  Emmanuel Technology Consulting

    http://etc-md.com

    Former Sophos SG(Astaro) advocate/researcher/Silver Partner

    PfSense w/Suricata, ntopng, 

    Other addons to follow

Children
No Data
Unfiltered HTML