This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Adding an explicit "allow" rule causes return packets to drop

I'm trying to set something up where I have a rule for a particular device on my LAN that will reject all traffic from that device to the internet (WAN on my XG), but then be able to define allow rules to sit above it in the rule list so that I can open up certain services. The problem is that even without the "reject" rule in place, the "accept" rule breaks communication! I'm so confused.

With the accept rule enabled, I can see packets go out through the rule in the logs, but nothing comes back. If I disable the accept rule, then communication works fine. What am I doing wrong??

From the log (shows 0 packets received):

Rule list:

Rule configuration:

To test, I'm trying to get to zoom.us from the "VTP White" device. I previously had the source zone set as LAN and destination zone as WAN, but changing them to Any/Any didn't change anything.



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • Hi,

    a couple of points

    1/. you do not need a reject/drop rule the firewall does that if there are no matching allow rules

    2/. depending on your rules whether the packets are dropped in the proxy then there will be shown as allowed but not provide a connection. I believe this is to be fixed in a coming mr release.

    3/. there are occasions I have found that using the device IP address (name) in the allowed network does not work as expected and I have had to change the allowed network to the internal network and use clientless users to manager access to the firewall rules. No errors are  logged, just does not work as expected.

    Ian

    XG115W - v20 GA - Home

    XG on VM 8 - v20 GA

    If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.

Reply
  • Hi,

    a couple of points

    1/. you do not need a reject/drop rule the firewall does that if there are no matching allow rules

    2/. depending on your rules whether the packets are dropped in the proxy then there will be shown as allowed but not provide a connection. I believe this is to be fixed in a coming mr release.

    3/. there are occasions I have found that using the device IP address (name) in the allowed network does not work as expected and I have had to change the allowed network to the internal network and use clientless users to manager access to the firewall rules. No errors are  logged, just does not work as expected.

    Ian

    XG115W - v20 GA - Home

    XG on VM 8 - v20 GA

    If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.

Children
No Data