Customers might be unable to connect with us via the Sophos Malaysia Support Hotline number. Our teams are actively working on a fix. In the interim, we request customers to use the backup hotline number - +65 3157 5922 (Singapore) or raise a support request at https://support.sophos.com/.

Help us enhance your Sophos Community experience. Share your thoughts in our Sophos Community survey.

This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

How do I close UDP Port 500?

I am failing a PCI scan because UDP Port 500 is showing as open|filtered on Nmap scans.  I see that this is the ISAKMP service.  However I do not have any IPsec connections defined, I have Cisco VPN disabled, and I even went so far as to create a Deny/Drop firewall rule for everything incoming hitting port 500, put it at the top, and that still doesn't work.

How do I find out what service on the XG has this port open and then close it?



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
  • We had used IPsec VPN to Sonicwalls at 2 remote locations; I tried shunting UDP500 to nothing - still failed the test.

    Since we have moved to RED appliances I had to use [service strongswan:stop -ds nosync] to disable that service and now we're passing.

  • manbearpig said:

    I took a quick google search for this. At the moment, nearly every vendor is struggling with those "ports". 

    I cannot test it right know, but as far as i know, UDP500 should be closed in case of not using IPsec for any. 

     

    There is some internal, hidden ACL that gets opened up the first time you enable IPsec, so that even if you later stop using it, the port remains "open" and when the PCI scan happens, strongswan is listening and you get all the failures.  Of course a connection won't work since there's nothing configured, but the point is when you stop using IPsec, the port should go back to being filtered/closed.  I ultimately just DNAT'd it to a null IP address and that was the end of that.

     

    Its a problem because even if you appeal it with the PCI vendor (I tried), they won't approve it and you have to do something about it or else you're out of compliance.