Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 39 subscribers
  • Views 332 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Feedback: XG Interface vs UTM

billybobadoo

As many others have, i wanted to add another voice.
i gotta say, the XG interface is terrible compared to the UTM.
We are a MSP, with UTMs at all our client locations, ever since Sophos sunset the CSP licensing for the UTMs, we're looking at switching to another vendor altogether.



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
  • 0

    I must disagree. Ui is in some sense good BUT u must just get used to it. It has some limitations  but it is developing  all the time  its gonna be only better - I hope :p 

    __________SETUP___________

    HP Small Form Factor:  i5 4Cores, 8Gb of RAM.
    Intel Network Card 5x Eth
    SSD: 256Gb

  • 0 in reply to Regex

    Hi Roman,

    I have to agree with the original poster, the XG interface has lots of information, some of it is not much value or meaning. Yes, you are correct it is improving but taking way to loo long. 

    The UTM interface has a way better show of system activity. Further the UTM interface is more responsive.

    Ian

    XG115W - v20 GA - Home

    XG on VM 8 - v20 GA

    If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.

Unfiltered HTML