Hello, I updated our UTM Cluster 1 1/2 weeks ago and kept one node reserved.
Today I wanted to upgrade the second node which led to the following status after waiting quite some time: This does not look in sync. What needs to be done in order to have…
Hello,
currently we have two SG330 nodes running in a high availability cluster. (active-passive)
In one or two months we want to replace this nodes against two SG450.
I have considered the following two replacement procedures:
******** Procedure…
We have Sophos UTM in an Active/Passive configuration. When i SSH to the master i should be able to connect to the slave with the command: ha_utils ssh.
When i do this on the master (with root) it says the following:
Connecting to slave 198.19.250…
Hello,
we are running a SG 330 Cluster and I noticed that the devices does not show newer firmware. What is the reason for this and how can I fix it? What happens if I manually update the Cluster from 9.703-3 to 9.705? Will the process be the same as…
We currently run a pretty inefficient WAN design, with each site having its own internet connection, and a UTM at each, with IPSec VPNs running back to our central site.
I am considering changing this to a different design - basically all our edge sites…
Hello,
I have a couple of questions regarding configuring HA on UTM SG105:
1) Is it necessary that we connect the master and slave with a dedicated Ethernet cable on the HA port? Or can we connect them thorough a switch (in case we need to place the…
Hi all,
On Friday I patched our Sophos UTM cluster to 9.506 and found that the cluster is broken unless the passive node is switched off. The VM's are on the same ESX host and I have checked that they both have Virtual mac setting set to 0. Has anyone…
Hi there, I've spent a little time testing the IPS offloading or load balancing behaviors while in a High Availability Cluster setup (Active/Active). I've setup two VM's on a ESXi 6.5 physical host. VMs have all the same networks, nics, ram, disks and…
I'm currently attempting to cluster two virtual UTM boxes.
utm1 - 192.168.106.88
utm2 - 192.168.106.178
Setting up utm1 as node 1 I enter the shared secret on both boxes and set them both to use eth2. They both get 192.168.106.88 which is what…