<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.sophos.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>AP50 and AP100 expected throughput</title><link>https://community.sophos.com/utm-firewall/f/wireless-security/56580/ap50-and-ap100-expected-throughput</link><description>Hey guys, I know this topic has come up several times, but usually it&amp;#39;s related to firmware or something similar. I just want to know what&amp;#39;s &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; for AP50/AP100 throughput.  Negotiated speed shown in UTM web interface is 866Mbit. Currently max</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: AP50 and AP100 expected throughput</title><link>https://community.sophos.com/thread/208955?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 07:12:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">4be5eb7d-caa4-4ff5-8e60-8f9463545a35:fcb4e30b-eb23-425c-946b-ae7efc2bca20</guid><dc:creator>rfcat_vk</dc:creator><description>Hi&amp;nbsp;folks,&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;nbsp;think&amp;nbsp;some&amp;nbsp;of&amp;nbsp;my&amp;nbsp;AP&amp;nbsp;50&amp;nbsp;iperf&amp;nbsp;results&amp;nbsp;my&amp;nbsp;be&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;little&amp;nbsp;flawed.&amp;nbsp;I&amp;nbsp;received&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;new&amp;nbsp;AP&amp;nbsp;55C&amp;nbsp;today&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;being&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;tech&amp;nbsp;head&amp;nbsp;couldn&amp;#39;t&amp;nbsp;wait&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;install&amp;nbsp;it.&lt;br /&gt;The&amp;nbsp;mac&amp;nbsp;mini&amp;nbsp;I&amp;nbsp;did&amp;nbsp;most&amp;nbsp;of&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;iperf&amp;nbsp;testing&amp;nbsp;with&amp;nbsp;only&amp;nbsp;connected&amp;nbsp;at&amp;nbsp;216mb/s,&amp;nbsp;where&amp;nbsp;as&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;mac&amp;nbsp;book&amp;nbsp;pro&amp;nbsp;connected&amp;nbsp;at&amp;nbsp;650mb/s&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;W10&amp;nbsp;box&amp;nbsp;with&amp;nbsp;an&amp;nbsp;TP-Link&amp;nbsp;USB&amp;nbsp;3&amp;nbsp;dongle&amp;nbsp;connected&amp;nbsp;at&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;advertised&amp;nbsp;rate&amp;nbsp;of&amp;nbsp;867mb/s.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So&amp;nbsp;far&amp;nbsp;very&amp;nbsp;impressed,&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;AP55C&amp;nbsp;weigh&amp;nbsp;significantly&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;than&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;AP50&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;comes&amp;nbsp;with&amp;nbsp;all&amp;nbsp;sorts&amp;nbsp;of&amp;nbsp;ceiling&amp;nbsp;mounts.&amp;nbsp;And&amp;nbsp;finally&amp;nbsp;it&amp;nbsp;cost&amp;nbsp;less&amp;nbsp;than&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;AP50&amp;nbsp;by&amp;nbsp;about&amp;nbsp;$200AUD.&amp;nbsp;There&amp;nbsp;was&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;toss&amp;nbsp;up&amp;nbsp;between&amp;nbsp;trying&amp;nbsp;this&amp;nbsp;or&amp;nbsp;an&amp;nbsp;Apple&amp;nbsp;Airport,&amp;nbsp;this&amp;nbsp;won&amp;nbsp;for&amp;nbsp;convenience,&amp;nbsp;not&amp;nbsp;throughput.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tomorrow&amp;nbsp;brings&amp;nbsp;forth&amp;nbsp;iperf&amp;nbsp;testing&amp;nbsp;on&amp;nbsp;my&amp;nbsp;new&amp;nbsp;toy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ian&amp;nbsp;M[[[:)]]][[[:)]]][[[:)]]]&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: AP50 and AP100 expected throughput</title><link>https://community.sophos.com/thread/208954?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2015 18:13:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">4be5eb7d-caa4-4ff5-8e60-8f9463545a35:d7356093-1989-41aa-ab68-d2f807222e68</guid><dc:creator>BeanAnimal</dc:creator><description>&lt;blockquote cite="joelcpatterson;297112"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sophos&amp;nbsp;has&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;known&amp;nbsp;issue&amp;nbsp;with&amp;nbsp;AP100&amp;#39;s&amp;nbsp;currently.&amp;nbsp;I&amp;nbsp;have&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;ticket&amp;nbsp;open&amp;nbsp;with&amp;nbsp;them.&amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;m&amp;nbsp;still&amp;nbsp;curious&amp;nbsp;about&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;ap50&amp;#39;s&amp;nbsp;which&amp;nbsp;are&amp;nbsp;supposed&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;have&amp;nbsp;300Mbits/s.&amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;d&amp;nbsp;love&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;info&amp;nbsp;directly&amp;nbsp;from&amp;nbsp;sophos&amp;nbsp;on&amp;nbsp;these&amp;nbsp;topics,&amp;nbsp;but&amp;nbsp;that&amp;nbsp;might&amp;nbsp;prove&amp;nbsp;hard&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;come&amp;nbsp;by.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Yes...&amp;nbsp;The&amp;nbsp;known&amp;nbsp;issue&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;that&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;hardware&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;firmware&amp;nbsp;are&amp;nbsp;steaming&amp;nbsp;piles&amp;nbsp;of&amp;nbsp;horse&amp;nbsp;crap.&amp;nbsp;Anybody&amp;nbsp;that&amp;nbsp;tries&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;argue&amp;nbsp;differently&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;being&amp;nbsp;intellectually&amp;nbsp;dishonest.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I&amp;nbsp;just&amp;nbsp;tossed&amp;nbsp;(literaly)&amp;nbsp;almost&amp;nbsp;20&amp;nbsp;Sophos&amp;nbsp;APs&amp;nbsp;in&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;trash.&amp;nbsp;I&amp;nbsp;am&amp;nbsp;replacing&amp;nbsp;all&amp;nbsp;of&amp;nbsp;my&amp;nbsp;customer&amp;nbsp;devices&amp;nbsp;with&amp;nbsp;Aruba&amp;nbsp;APs.&amp;nbsp;It&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;doing&amp;nbsp;wonders&amp;nbsp;for&amp;nbsp;my&amp;nbsp;mood&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;sanity.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: AP50 and AP100 expected throughput</title><link>https://community.sophos.com/thread/208953?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2015 18:36:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">4be5eb7d-caa4-4ff5-8e60-8f9463545a35:8fd54da5-7122-4ed6-b54f-591111ad1749</guid><dc:creator>rfcat_vk</dc:creator><description>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;changed&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;wifi&amp;nbsp;dongle&amp;nbsp;so&amp;nbsp;it&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;connected&amp;nbsp;tot&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;USB&amp;nbsp;3.0&amp;nbsp;port.&amp;nbsp;Wifi&amp;nbsp;dongle&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;about&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;metre&amp;nbsp;away&amp;nbsp;from&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;AP50.&amp;nbsp;The&amp;nbsp;UTM&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;passing&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;traffic&amp;nbsp;between&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;wifi&amp;nbsp;seperate&amp;nbsp;zone&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;vlan&amp;nbsp;using&amp;nbsp;packet&amp;nbsp;filtering.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Running&amp;nbsp;iperf&amp;nbsp;defaults&amp;nbsp;I&amp;nbsp;can&amp;nbsp;achieve&amp;nbsp;about&amp;nbsp;95Mb/s&amp;nbsp;throughput.&lt;br /&gt;Using&amp;nbsp;larger&amp;nbsp;t&amp;nbsp;values&amp;nbsp;I&amp;nbsp;can&amp;nbsp;achieve&amp;nbsp;about&amp;nbsp;120Mb/s&amp;nbsp;throughput&lt;br /&gt;Using&amp;nbsp;-t60&amp;nbsp;-P15&amp;nbsp;I&amp;nbsp;can&amp;nbsp;achieve&amp;nbsp;163Mb/s&amp;nbsp;throughput.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;In&amp;nbsp;summary&amp;nbsp;using&amp;nbsp;-P&amp;nbsp;10,&amp;nbsp;-W&amp;nbsp;1900k&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;-t&amp;nbsp;120&amp;nbsp;I&amp;nbsp;was&amp;nbsp;consistently&amp;nbsp;achieving&amp;nbsp;over&amp;nbsp;150Mb/s&amp;nbsp;throughput.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Somewhere&amp;nbsp;in&amp;nbsp;my&amp;nbsp;distant&amp;nbsp;past&amp;nbsp;I&amp;nbsp;used&amp;nbsp;ot&amp;nbsp;believe&amp;nbsp;rightly&amp;nbsp;or&amp;nbsp;wrongly&amp;nbsp;that&amp;nbsp;wifi&amp;nbsp;throughout&amp;nbsp;was&amp;nbsp;about&amp;nbsp;50%&amp;nbsp;of&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;advertised&amp;nbsp;value&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;so&amp;nbsp;far&amp;nbsp;with&amp;nbsp;my&amp;nbsp;testing&amp;nbsp;on&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;Sophos&amp;nbsp;AP50&amp;nbsp;that&amp;nbsp;agrees.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ian&amp;nbsp;M&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: AP50 and AP100 expected throughput</title><link>https://community.sophos.com/thread/208952?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2015 06:39:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">4be5eb7d-caa4-4ff5-8e60-8f9463545a35:f42b8b5e-2639-4c94-a5bc-e32b61de7a92</guid><dc:creator>rfcat_vk</dc:creator><description>Found&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;bottleneck.&amp;nbsp;The&amp;nbsp;wifi&amp;nbsp;card&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;usb3&amp;nbsp;device&amp;nbsp;plugged&amp;nbsp;into&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;usb2.0&amp;nbsp;port.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;nbsp;will&amp;nbsp;change&amp;nbsp;it&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;usb&amp;nbsp;3&amp;nbsp;port&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;repeat&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;tests.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ian&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: AP50 and AP100 expected throughput</title><link>https://community.sophos.com/thread/208951?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 13:35:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">4be5eb7d-caa4-4ff5-8e60-8f9463545a35:64ae7405-b682-49ff-b3a2-b750a1fecea9</guid><dc:creator>JoelPatterson</dc:creator><description>So&amp;nbsp;you&amp;nbsp;were&amp;nbsp;getting&amp;nbsp;good&amp;nbsp;measurements&amp;nbsp;through&amp;nbsp;your&amp;nbsp;gigabit&amp;nbsp;switch.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One&amp;nbsp;additional&amp;nbsp;thing&amp;nbsp;you&amp;nbsp;can&amp;nbsp;try&amp;nbsp;with&amp;nbsp;iperf&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;parrallel&amp;nbsp;test.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;iperf.exe&amp;nbsp;-c&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;-P&amp;nbsp;8&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That&amp;nbsp;get&amp;#39;s&amp;nbsp;me&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;full&amp;nbsp;1gig&amp;nbsp;physical&amp;nbsp;connection&amp;nbsp;speed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Doesn&amp;#39;t&amp;nbsp;do&amp;nbsp;much&amp;nbsp;for&amp;nbsp;my&amp;nbsp;wifi&amp;nbsp;however.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: AP50 and AP100 expected throughput</title><link>https://community.sophos.com/thread/208950?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2015 20:02:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">4be5eb7d-caa4-4ff5-8e60-8f9463545a35:ad5b3a23-be01-43ed-840c-e34a7c244f9f</guid><dc:creator>rfcat_vk</dc:creator><description>More&amp;nbsp;results.&lt;br /&gt;The&amp;nbsp;AP&amp;nbsp;50&amp;nbsp;2.4ghz&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;5.0ghz&amp;nbsp;bands&amp;nbsp;are&amp;nbsp;set&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;40mhz&amp;nbsp;channels.&lt;br /&gt;On&amp;nbsp;5ghz&amp;nbsp;SSID.&lt;br /&gt;The&amp;nbsp;maximum&amp;nbsp;throughput&amp;nbsp;was&amp;nbsp;140Mbits/sec,&amp;nbsp;not&amp;nbsp;repeatable.&lt;br /&gt;Repeatable&amp;nbsp;was&amp;nbsp;120Mbits/s&lt;br /&gt;On&amp;nbsp;2.4hz&amp;nbsp;SSID&lt;br /&gt;Maximum&amp;nbsp;throughput&amp;nbsp;was&amp;nbsp;69Mbits/s,&amp;nbsp;though&amp;nbsp;various&amp;nbsp;network&amp;nbsp;monitors&amp;nbsp;did&amp;nbsp;show&amp;nbsp;peaks&amp;nbsp;over&amp;nbsp;over&amp;nbsp;75Mbits/s.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ran&amp;nbsp;most&amp;nbsp;tests&amp;nbsp;for&amp;nbsp;60s&amp;nbsp;with&amp;nbsp;window&amp;nbsp;of&amp;nbsp;2000k&lt;br /&gt;-t&amp;nbsp;60&amp;nbsp;-w&amp;nbsp;2000k&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;nbsp;tried&amp;nbsp;various&amp;nbsp;test&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;see&amp;nbsp;if&amp;nbsp;I&amp;nbsp;could&amp;nbsp;locate&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;bottleneck.&lt;br /&gt;The&amp;nbsp;LAN&amp;nbsp;(VM&amp;nbsp;server)&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;LAN&amp;nbsp;(parallels&amp;nbsp;W7)&amp;nbsp;throughput&amp;nbsp;reported&amp;nbsp;over&amp;nbsp;800Mbits/s.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The&amp;nbsp;server&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;W7&amp;nbsp;machines&amp;nbsp;are&amp;nbsp;all&amp;nbsp;virtual.&amp;nbsp;The&amp;nbsp;W10&amp;nbsp;machine&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;physical&amp;nbsp;machine.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ian&amp;nbsp;M&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;L3&amp;nbsp;switch&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;Netgear&amp;nbsp;716&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: AP50 and AP100 expected throughput</title><link>https://community.sophos.com/thread/208949?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2015 08:21:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">4be5eb7d-caa4-4ff5-8e60-8f9463545a35:10e327c2-0fe8-4698-8f36-7c61704ced22</guid><dc:creator>JoelPatterson</dc:creator><description>Max&amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;ve&amp;nbsp;ever&amp;nbsp;gotten&amp;nbsp;was&amp;nbsp;103&amp;nbsp;Mbit&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;per&amp;nbsp;second.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;Ap&amp;nbsp;50&lt;br /&gt;Windows&amp;nbsp;7&amp;nbsp;client,&amp;nbsp;AC&amp;nbsp;wireless&lt;br /&gt;Window&amp;nbsp;2008&amp;nbsp;server&lt;br /&gt;Gigabit&amp;nbsp;switch&amp;nbsp;with&amp;nbsp;jumbo&amp;nbsp;frames&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: AP50 and AP100 expected throughput</title><link>https://community.sophos.com/thread/208948?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2015 06:51:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">4be5eb7d-caa4-4ff5-8e60-8f9463545a35:0e7a7d16-7b3c-40af-a981-1b69e76bddd6</guid><dc:creator>rfcat_vk</dc:creator><description>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;tonight&amp;nbsp;I&amp;nbsp;tested&amp;nbsp;iperf&amp;nbsp;throughput.&lt;br /&gt;Environment&lt;br /&gt;1/.&amp;nbsp;Source&amp;nbsp;small&amp;nbsp;office&amp;nbsp;server&amp;nbsp;2012&amp;nbsp;running&amp;nbsp;on&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;VM&amp;nbsp;esxi5.5&lt;br /&gt;2/.&amp;nbsp;destination&amp;nbsp;windows&amp;nbsp;10&amp;nbsp;beta&amp;nbsp;running&amp;nbsp;on&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;e3-1240v3&lt;br /&gt;3/.&amp;nbsp;Sophos&amp;nbsp;AP&amp;nbsp;50&amp;nbsp;ssid&amp;nbsp;5.0ghz&lt;br /&gt;4/.&amp;nbsp;USB&amp;nbsp;wifi&amp;nbsp;on&amp;nbsp;Windows&amp;nbsp;10&amp;nbsp;PC&lt;br /&gt;5/.&amp;nbsp;AP&amp;nbsp;part&amp;nbsp;of&amp;nbsp;VLAN&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Performance&lt;br /&gt;best&lt;br /&gt;UTM&amp;nbsp;reported&amp;nbsp;W10&amp;nbsp;PC&amp;nbsp;connected&amp;nbsp;at&amp;nbsp;240Mb/s&lt;br /&gt;transferred&amp;nbsp;320Mbytes&amp;nbsp;at&amp;nbsp;89.5Mbits/sec.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Because&amp;nbsp;of&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;design&amp;nbsp;of&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;room&amp;nbsp;where&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;AP&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;located,&amp;nbsp;it&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;semi&amp;nbsp;rf&amp;nbsp;shielded&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;I&amp;nbsp;am&amp;nbsp;unable&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;connect&amp;nbsp;at&amp;nbsp;300Mb/s.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tomorrow&amp;nbsp;morning&amp;nbsp;when&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;rest&amp;nbsp;of&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;house&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;asleep&amp;nbsp;I&amp;nbsp;will&amp;nbsp;extend&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;AP&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;room&amp;nbsp;where&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;PC&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;located&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;run&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;tests&amp;nbsp;again.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;nbsp;know&amp;nbsp;I&amp;nbsp;can&amp;nbsp;get&amp;nbsp;better&amp;nbsp;throughput&amp;nbsp;than&amp;nbsp;that.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ian&amp;nbsp;M&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: AP50 and AP100 expected throughput</title><link>https://community.sophos.com/thread/208947?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 16:31:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">4be5eb7d-caa4-4ff5-8e60-8f9463545a35:ed5c7a55-1a8d-4f19-aa2c-e7d9ab5b4c4f</guid><dc:creator>JoelPatterson</dc:creator><description>Unfortunately,&amp;nbsp;copying&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;file&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;different&amp;nbsp;that&amp;nbsp;measuring&amp;nbsp;throughput&amp;nbsp;with&amp;nbsp;iperf.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With&amp;nbsp;iperf,&amp;nbsp;you&amp;nbsp;should&amp;nbsp;get&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;actual&amp;nbsp;possible&amp;nbsp;bandwidth&amp;nbsp;your&amp;nbsp;equipment&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;capable&amp;nbsp;of.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="https://iperf.fr/"&gt;https://iperf.fr/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sophos&amp;nbsp;has&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;known&amp;nbsp;issue&amp;nbsp;with&amp;nbsp;AP100&amp;#39;s&amp;nbsp;currently.&amp;nbsp;I&amp;nbsp;have&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;ticket&amp;nbsp;open&amp;nbsp;with&amp;nbsp;them.&amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;m&amp;nbsp;still&amp;nbsp;curious&amp;nbsp;about&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;ap50&amp;#39;s&amp;nbsp;which&amp;nbsp;are&amp;nbsp;supposed&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;have&amp;nbsp;300Mbits/s.&amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;d&amp;nbsp;love&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;info&amp;nbsp;directly&amp;nbsp;from&amp;nbsp;sophos&amp;nbsp;on&amp;nbsp;these&amp;nbsp;topics,&amp;nbsp;but&amp;nbsp;that&amp;nbsp;might&amp;nbsp;prove&amp;nbsp;hard&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;come&amp;nbsp;by.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: AP50 and AP100 expected throughput</title><link>https://community.sophos.com/thread/208946?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 16:40:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">4be5eb7d-caa4-4ff5-8e60-8f9463545a35:5e7ebcf7-6938-45dd-a830-3f05325b6929</guid><dc:creator>rfcat_vk</dc:creator><description>Hi&amp;nbsp;Joel,&lt;br /&gt;mine&amp;nbsp;do&amp;nbsp;show&amp;nbsp;at&amp;nbsp;300mb/s&amp;nbsp;on&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;UTM&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;I&amp;nbsp;have&amp;nbsp;got&amp;nbsp;way&amp;nbsp;better&amp;nbsp;then&amp;nbsp;90mb/s&amp;nbsp;throughput.&amp;nbsp;I&amp;nbsp;will&amp;nbsp;try&amp;nbsp;again&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;report&amp;nbsp;back.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ian&amp;nbsp;M&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Currently&amp;nbsp;copying&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;66gb&amp;nbsp;folder&amp;nbsp;between&amp;nbsp;mac&amp;nbsp;mini&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;mac&amp;nbsp;book&amp;nbsp;pro.&amp;nbsp;UTM&amp;nbsp;shows&amp;nbsp;mac&amp;nbsp;book&amp;nbsp;pro&amp;nbsp;connected&amp;nbsp;at&amp;nbsp;300mb/s.&amp;nbsp;The&amp;nbsp;throughput&amp;nbsp;shown&amp;nbsp;by&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;mac&amp;nbsp;book&amp;nbsp;pro&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;between&amp;nbsp;19.0MB/s&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;26.5MB/s&amp;nbsp;which&amp;nbsp;works&amp;nbsp;out&amp;nbsp;around&amp;nbsp;200mb/s.&amp;nbsp;Given&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;overheads&amp;nbsp;of&amp;nbsp;wifi&amp;nbsp;I&amp;nbsp;doubt&amp;nbsp;you&amp;nbsp;would&amp;nbsp;get&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;300mb/s&amp;nbsp;as&amp;nbsp;actual&amp;nbsp;data&amp;nbsp;throughput.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: AP50 and AP100 expected throughput</title><link>https://community.sophos.com/thread/208945?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 08:35:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">4be5eb7d-caa4-4ff5-8e60-8f9463545a35:d5439b17-79ea-4ea8-9ec2-8bfd7a1dca00</guid><dc:creator>JoelPatterson</dc:creator><description>Hey&amp;nbsp;Ian,&lt;br /&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;for&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;reply&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;info.&amp;nbsp;Yep,&amp;nbsp;I&amp;nbsp;actually&amp;nbsp;do&amp;nbsp;have&amp;nbsp;my&amp;nbsp;AP50&amp;#39;s&amp;nbsp;set&amp;nbsp;on&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;40Mhz&amp;nbsp;channel&amp;nbsp;width&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;running&amp;nbsp;an&amp;nbsp;exclusive&amp;nbsp;5Ghz&amp;nbsp;SSID.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If&amp;nbsp;you&amp;nbsp;take&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;look&amp;nbsp;at&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;included&amp;nbsp;image.&amp;nbsp;The&amp;nbsp;negotiated&amp;nbsp;speed&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;270Mbps.&amp;nbsp;It&amp;nbsp;shows&amp;nbsp;this&amp;nbsp;in&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;network&amp;nbsp;info&amp;nbsp;on&amp;nbsp;my&amp;nbsp;PC&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;in&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;AP&amp;nbsp;info&amp;nbsp;on&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;UTM.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The&amp;nbsp;actual&amp;nbsp;throughput&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;only&amp;nbsp;91Mbps.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When&amp;nbsp;you&amp;nbsp;say&amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;300Mbps&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;that&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;measured&amp;nbsp;speed,&amp;nbsp;or&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;that&amp;nbsp;based&amp;nbsp;off&amp;nbsp;of&amp;nbsp;specs&amp;nbsp;for&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;device?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><enclosure url="https://community.sophos.com/cfs-file/__key/telligent-evolution-components-attachments/00-60-01-00-00-20-89-45/Wireless-AP50.jpg" length="91082" type="application/octet-stream" /></item><item><title>RE: AP50 and AP100 expected throughput</title><link>https://community.sophos.com/thread/208944?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 05:32:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">4be5eb7d-caa4-4ff5-8e60-8f9463545a35:249a5a73-9727-460d-8e2d-9a3186d27e97</guid><dc:creator>rfcat_vk</dc:creator><description>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;not&amp;nbsp;sure&amp;nbsp;where&amp;nbsp;you&amp;nbsp;are&amp;nbsp;getting&amp;nbsp;your&amp;nbsp;AP50&amp;nbsp;figures&amp;nbsp;from?&amp;nbsp;The&amp;nbsp;5ghz&amp;nbsp;channel&amp;nbsp;on&amp;nbsp;an&amp;nbsp;AP&amp;nbsp;will&amp;nbsp;give&amp;nbsp;300mb/s&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;2.4ghz&amp;nbsp;will&amp;nbsp;also&amp;nbsp;give&amp;nbsp;300mb/s.&lt;br /&gt;You&amp;nbsp;need&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;change&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;config&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;use&amp;nbsp;40mkz&amp;nbsp;ht&amp;nbsp;channels&amp;nbsp;in&amp;nbsp;lieu&amp;nbsp;of&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;default&amp;nbsp;20mz&amp;nbsp;ht&amp;nbsp;channels.&amp;nbsp;There&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;sticky&amp;nbsp;on&amp;nbsp;how&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;change&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;settings&amp;nbsp;at&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;top&amp;nbsp;of&amp;nbsp;this&amp;nbsp;forum.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ian&amp;nbsp;M&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>