I have a weird one.
We have 2 UTMs, both running 9.705-3 doing WAF for Exchange Server deployed per the KB - https://support.sophos.com/support/s/article/KB-000038003?language=en_US
Everything is working fine, but we are renewing our annual security test including a PenTestOne of these is showing as vulnerable to clickjacking and one is not
I have gone through the config side by side and both look identical, i cant figure it out.
The links offered up by the PenTest software are:
But i can't find a way to insert these headers.
If i test with https://www.lookout.net/test/clickjack.html one does load the page (which it shouldn't) and one does not load the page denying the connection (which should be the behaviour) so something isn't set correctly, its just where to change it
Can anyone shove me in the right direction?
Ok, found it after stitching together multiple other threads on the topic.
Firstly: THIS IS NOT A SUPPORTED CONFIG FROM SOPHOS. YOU DO SO AT YOUR OWN RISK. Secondly: THIS IS NOT A SUPPORTED CONFIG. You…
Hi and welcome to the UTM Community!
Standard questions: On the one working correctly, do you see the block in the WAF log or in the Intrusion Prevention log? Have you tried restoring a recent config backup on the bad guy? Have you tried re-booting?
Cheers - Bob
There is no block happening, and that is the problem.
I have not tried a reboot or a config restoration. I did restart apache however, no dice.
Where is the block in the unit that behaves correctly? This will be a clue to avoid the following...
My usual suggestion would be to try the following, in order, on the misbehaving unit until the problem disappears:
Any luck with that?