My question – what am I doing wrong about site path routing setup? Is what I am trying to do achievable?
Hello Ascar,Please consider, you need the path called at the virtual web server (https://www.abc.com/commerce) at the real webserver too.(commerce.abc.com/commerce )
Sophos Solution Partner since 2003 If a post solves your question click the 'Verify Answer' link.
Thanks for suggestion.
Do you mean a separate path route should be set up in UTM or you mean on the real webserver https://commerce.abc.com I should have a folder under the site root like application_folder/commerce? I am confused.
I tried adding a folder 'commerce' inside the application folder which should not have any impact and it did not other than throwing a 403 Error since there is no default document in the folder.
If you mean that it should be a site path route in UTM then I don't know how to do it.
site 1: https://www.abc.com should hit the default page of the site 1
site 1: https://www.abc.com/commerce should open the default page of the site 2 in the context path of site 1
So, what kind of route should I write for https://commerce.abc.com ?
I made an additional path route which looks like this
Virtual Web Server: https://commerce.abc.com
Real Web Server: Real Webserver for Virtual Server 2
However I still get the same 404 errors, so my source server (Webserver 1) is still trying to locate an non-existent folder in its file system, which I believe, means site path routing instruction has no effect on Webserver 1. What do you think?
with Path: /commerce --> Real WebServer 2 the Webserver 1 should not show you access.
Please give us some screenshots from virtual ws, real ws and sitepath settings.