This discussion has been locked.

You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

SUM - VPN Definition

I have such topology:

10.1.1.0/24<>(192.168.1.2)ISP1(public ip)(public ip)ISP2(192.168.100.1)(192.168.100.2)UTM2-------------->172.16.0.0/24
Classic model where UTM is before ISP and NAT takes place on ISP router.

SUM takes GW ip address from UTM WAN Interfaces, which is wrong because that are 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.100.2 addresses and of course VPN tunnel dont want to get up. How can I Change this behaviour?

This thread was automatically locked due to age.

Parents

0 BAlfson over 9 years ago

I'll move this to the SUM forum where you're more likely to get a better answer than mine. I don't believe this is possible with a SUM configuration because you have a NATting router in front of both UTMs.

Cheers - Bob

Sophos UTM Community Moderator
Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
Gold Solution Partner since 2005

MediaSoft, Inc. USA
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Reply

0 BAlfson over 9 years ago

I'll move this to the SUM forum where you're more likely to get a better answer than mine. I don't believe this is possible with a SUM configuration because you have a NATting router in front of both UTMs.

Cheers - Bob

Sophos UTM Community Moderator
Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
Gold Solution Partner since 2005

MediaSoft, Inc. USA
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Children

No Data