Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 5 replies
  • Subscribers 2 subscribers
  • Views 2967 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Red Subnet with Mask

uz.reiter
Today I tested our first red and its handling is realy smart.
In the future I want to use some 25 Reds.
So I would like to split subnet spaces by masking i.e. 255.255.255.248 in order not to create to many subnets with all the configuration needs.
When creating a new red entry I can only enter x.x.x.1 for the red, no more net definitions.
How can I do this?
Maybe in the future?


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    It seems like you might want to have an addressing scheme that reflects the physical location of each RED, and that would be easier to do if you chose the "classic" approach of assuming that you were using 255.255.255.0.

    For example, you could assign them like this, naming each RED interface by its location:

    Beijing = 172.20.1.x
    Frankfurt = 172.20.2.x
    Paris = 172.20.3.x
    Etc.


    Then, that would let you create a network definition for a supernet = 172.20.0.0/19 which would include all locations.  All of the other subnet definitions would be created by the Astaro.  In addition to "Internal (Network)", you would have "Beijing (Network)", "Frankfurt (Network)", etc.

    Then again, maybe I've misunderstood your question?

    Cheers - Bob
     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
  • 0 in reply to BAlfson

    Then again, maybe I've misunderstood your question?



    Thanks Bob - everything well understood, but the ip-adresses are given at C-Level.
Reply Children
No Data
Unfiltered HTML