This discussion has been locked.

You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Setting up surfing quota policy for network group

Hello,

I want to setup and implement a policy for a maximum amount of hours a day internet connection for a group of network devices, based on static network entries. We are not using not users/groups on out networks because that's to much hassle and we don't people to login all the time. Is it possible to setup such policy for a for a network or mac address group on UTM 9?

This thread was automatically locked due to age.

Parents

0 vilic over 8 years ago

It should be possible by using separate Web Filter Profile for selected Network Definition objects, Policy for ANY and new Filter Action that blocks all of the content except ALL (custom defined category) that includes all of the 100+ subcategories.

In Additional Options:
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 uniquesmcs over 8 years ago in reply to vilic

I know define categories wise quota,

But I have to do if this possible define a user wise quota..?
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 sachingurung over 8 years ago in reply to uniquesmcs

Hi,

You have a similar post here:

https://community.sophos.com/products/unified-threat-management/f/51/t/75928

User wise quota is not possible in UTM 9.

Thanks

Sachin Gurung

Sachin Gurung
Team Lead | Sophos Technical Support
Knowledge Base | @SophosSupport | Video tutorials
Remember to like a post. If a post (on a question thread) solves your question use the 'This helped me' link.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 BAlfson over 8 years ago in reply to sachingurung

I think I understand now, Sachin, that there's a bit of confusion between "per user" or "user wise" and "by user name." Certainly, you are correct that you can only make rules for a user name in Web Filtering. You can effectively achieve "per user" limitations in QoS by making a "per IP" selection in the Traffic Selector definition. English can have some subtle traps in terminology.

Cheers - Bob

Sophos UTM Community Moderator
Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
Gold Solution Partner since 2005

MediaSoft, Inc. USA
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
+1 sachingurung over 8 years ago in reply to BAlfson

Hi,

Language can be deceiving. Technically, User(s) cannot be compared with an IP address, because IP address association can change after the end of a periodic DHCP lease time. But again, if we treat the post to be addressed for a user in conjunction with an IP address, QoS is possible!

Thanks

Sachin Gurung

Sachin Gurung
Team Lead | Sophos Technical Support
Knowledge Base | @SophosSupport | Video tutorials
Remember to like a post. If a post (on a question thread) solves your question use the 'This helped me' link.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Reply

+1 sachingurung over 8 years ago in reply to BAlfson

Hi,

Language can be deceiving. Technically, User(s) cannot be compared with an IP address, because IP address association can change after the end of a periodic DHCP lease time. But again, if we treat the post to be addressed for a user in conjunction with an IP address, QoS is possible!

Thanks

Sachin Gurung

Sachin Gurung
Team Lead | Sophos Technical Support
Knowledge Base | @SophosSupport | Video tutorials
Remember to like a post. If a post (on a question thread) solves your question use the 'This helped me' link.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Children

No Data