This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Another "which CPU for home" query

I've been running UTM on a fanless J1900-based minipc for just over 5 years.   However, the box has recently died; time for a replacement.

I've read various posts spanning a number of years & the recurring suggestion seems to be higher clockspeed is better.

Just to update for more-moderb times, but looking at budget options, is there potentially much difference between (for example):

  • Celeron J1900 (Quad core 2M Cache, 2.0  GHz, up to 2.42GHz)
  • Celeron N2920 (Quad core 2M Cache, 1.86 GHz, up To 2.0GHz)
  • Celeron J4125 (Quad core 4M Cache, 2.00 GHz, up to 2.70 GHz)
  • Celeron 3215U (Dual core 2M Cache, 1.70 GHz)
  • Core i3-4005U (Dual core 3M Cache, 1.70 GHz)
  • Pentium 4405U (Dual core 2M Cache, 2.10 ghz)

The dead J1900 had 8GB DRAM, although as home version is limited to 6GB usable,  would 4GB potentially be viable?

Historical PRTG graphing indicates:

  • Was generally operating with approx. 600-800MB of memory free
  • Running between 10-15% CPU usage.

Although, maybe it was just putting the available RAM to use because it could? If scrimping on DRAM would hamper it from the start, then not a good saving!

Currently on a 38Mbps internet connection (no immediate plans to increase, but it could happen);  was running firewall/NAT/IPS/URL filter/WIFI/shaping/most services apart from VPN.    I'm sure I'd tried the multi-core SNORT command, and could see approx 25Mbps peak.   Also have a AP50,  although I guess support for that will be dropped at some point.

Sure, I can compare passmark etc,  but any thoughts/suggestions/gotchas on the above CPU/RAM or alternatives?
I'm wavering between J4125 & 4405U, but I'm really not sure.

As mentioned, the J1900 was fine whilst it was alive.

Thanks!



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • Hi and welcome to the UTM Community!

    Depends on the number of active users.  If you have more than two active users, you will find that a slower quad-core will outperform a faster dual-core.  SNORT is single-threaded in UTM and is indeed the limiting issue.

    Cheers - Bob
    PS If you've driven that car at Monaco, we're all jealous!

     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
  • Also keep in mind that if you choose to change to XG, you have hardware limitations as well that UTM doesn't have. 

    6 GB memory, 4 cores CPU. UTM just has the 50 IP limitation.

    I sure wish Snort wasn't single-threaded, it would be so much better than what it is now.  Weary

    OPNSense 64-bit | Intel Xeon 4-core v3 1225 3.20Ghz
    16GB Memory | 500GB SSD HDD | ATT Fiber 1GB
    (Former Sophos UTM Veteran, Former XG Rookie)

Reply
  • Also keep in mind that if you choose to change to XG, you have hardware limitations as well that UTM doesn't have. 

    6 GB memory, 4 cores CPU. UTM just has the 50 IP limitation.

    I sure wish Snort wasn't single-threaded, it would be so much better than what it is now.  Weary

    OPNSense 64-bit | Intel Xeon 4-core v3 1225 3.20Ghz
    16GB Memory | 500GB SSD HDD | ATT Fiber 1GB
    (Former Sophos UTM Veteran, Former XG Rookie)

Children
No Data