This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

SG115W massive Probleme mit Bridge to AP LAN 9.705-3

Hallo zusammen,

das Thema habe ich zwar schon öfters hier gelesen, aber weitergeholfen hat es mir nicht. Wir haben massive Probleme mit dem Modell SG115W.

SSID's die über Separate Zone ausgestrahlt werden, funktionieren soweit. Das Bridge to AP LAN Wifi funktioniert nicht. Die SSID ist sichtbar, Clients können sich aber nicht verbinden:

 hostapd: id="4105" severity="info" sys="System" sub="WiFi" name="STA WPA failure" ssid="WifiXY" ssid_id="WLAN0" bssid="00:1a:8c:0a:a6:00" sta="58:96:1d:75:7a:47" reason_code="2"
hostapd: wifi0: STA 58:96:1d:75:7a:47 WPA: event 3 notification
hostapd: wifi0: STA 58:96:1d:75:7a:47 IEEE 802.1X: unauthorizing port
hostapd: wifi0: STA 58:96:1d:75:7a:47 MLME: MLME-DEAUTHENTICATE.indication(58:96:1d:75:7a:47, 2)
hostapd: wifi0: STA 58:96:1d:75:7a:47 MLME: MLME-DELETEKEYS.request(58:96:1d:75:7a:47)
hostapd: wifi0: STA 58:96:1d:75:7a:47 WPA: event 3 notification
hostapd: wifi0: STA 58:96:1d:75:7a:47 IEEE 802.1X: unauthorizing port
hostapd: wifi0: STA 58:96:1d:75:7a:47 IEEE 802.11: deauthenticated
hostapd: wifi0: STA 58:96:1d:75:7a:47 MLME: MLME-DEAUTHENTICATE.indication(58:96:1d:75:7a:47, 1)
hostapd: wifi0: STA 58:96:1d:75:7a:47 MLME: MLME-DELETEKEYS.request(58:96:1d:75:7a:47)

Passwort ist richtig, daher ist die Fehlermeldung STA WPA failure unlogisch. Was bedeutet reason_code="2" ?

Was mich wundert ist die Meldung IEEE 802.1X: unauthorizing port



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • Hallo,

    (Sorry, my German-speaking brain isn't creating thoughts at the moment. Frowning2)

    Your earlier posts were in the XG Community, should one of us move this thread there?

    IN UTM, the answer is that you must manually create a bridged interface from your LAN and add the bridged-to-AP-LAN wireless NIC to your bridge.  I don't know if the same is necessary with XG.

    MfG - Bob (Bitte auf Deutsch weiterhin.)

     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
Reply
  • Hallo,

    (Sorry, my German-speaking brain isn't creating thoughts at the moment. Frowning2)

    Your earlier posts were in the XG Community, should one of us move this thread there?

    IN UTM, the answer is that you must manually create a bridged interface from your LAN and add the bridged-to-AP-LAN wireless NIC to your bridge.  I don't know if the same is necessary with XG.

    MfG - Bob (Bitte auf Deutsch weiterhin.)

     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
Children
  • Hi BAlfson,

    sorry it is a UTM, no XG.

    "IN UTM, the answer is that you must manually create a bridged interface from your LAN and add the bridged-to-AP-LAN wireless NIC to your bridge.  I don't know if the same is necessary with XG."

    Really? I thought that this workaround was only the right way in the past ?