This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Weird UTM freezes randomly approximately once a day ...

I have experienced a strange lockup on my "new" UTM box, but I checked log files and they don't reveal anything, just a bunch of weird characters ...

2023:03:16-01:32:01 escape75 /usr/sbin/cron[25494]: (root) CMD (  nice -n19 /usr/local/bin/gen_inline_reporting_data.plx)
2023:03:16-01:35:01 escape75 /usr/sbin/cron[25649]: (root) CMD (   /usr/local/bin/reporter/system-reporter.pl)
�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
2023:03:16-09:03:10 escape75 syslog-ng[4942]: syslog-ng starting up; version='3.4.7' 2023:03:16-09:03:12 escape75 ddclient[5361]: WARNING: cannot connect to checkip.dyndns.org:80 socket: IO::Socket::INET: Bad hostname 'checkip.dyndns.org' 2023:03:16-09:03:24 escape75 system: System was restarted



So,- I've been running the software version of UTM (9.714) on my old unit (an XG115 r2) for a couple of years without any issues,
and recently I have migrated my saved config over to a new unit (XG115 r3) and a few hours after setting up the new unit (at night)

it froze up, and interfaces were not pingable (LAN) so I powered it down and rebooted. It's working again ...

Just wondering if there's something more I can look at to see what the issue was .. I have a hunch maybe it was DHCP related,
as my devices on the LAN were renewing the IP addresses and they were not in the table on the new unit, but it's a wild guess,
so if this doesn't happen again then maybe it's nothing to worry about.

I don't know if there would be an issue moving the config file (and license) from the old unit, but I wouldn't think so.

The new unit was installed the same way as the old unit, using the ssi-9.714-4.1.iso file and removing the /etc/asg with a software license,
and the old unit hasn't experienced any weird issues in years, and the ethernet ports and devices are setup in an identical way, nothing changed.

Just looking for thoughts and ideas ...

Stats from top:

top - 11:32:20 up 2:31, 1 user, load average: 0.09, 0.29, 0.25
Tasks: 163 total, 1 running, 160 sleeping, 0 stopped, 2 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.6%us, 0.5%sy, 0.0%ni, 98.5%id, 0.1%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.3%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 3898468k total, 3558768k used, 339700k free, 111124k buffers
Swap: 4194300k total, 112k used, 4194188k free, 1352808k cached

Zombies:

USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
root 18256 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z 11:30 0:00 [aua.bin] <defunct>
root 18595 0.6 0.0 0 0 ? Z 11:32 0:00 [confd.plx] <defunct>



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
  • Yes I would also think that’s the case …

    I don’t think it’s the power supply because I am using the same one I’m also using for my XG115 r2.

    It’s the original 12v 3a power supply, and I tried both plugs in the r3, I believe they are for failover.

    Unless somehow the r3 requires more power than what’s labeled on the unit …

  • Well, I opened it up and cleaned the board with alcohol, then coated with wd-40, now it's nice and shiny.
    Also replaced the CMOS battery which was reading 3.0v, so theoretically still good but not 3.3v.

    We'll see what happens ... if it still freezes up then I guess it's a hardware fault of some sort.

  • I assume the chassis is the heatsink?

    What's the wd40 for?

  • Yes, the underside of the chassis has a big heatsink mounted to it, and the CPU connects to it with a gummy thermal pad that can be re-installed after being taken off.

    I imagine the heatsink is big as it's meant to possibly be used for other models that have other chips that need cooling, as it's basically almost the size of the motherboard.

    The wd40 is meant as a corrosion inhibitor, but in my case I was using it to clean the board after the alcohol, as apparently it's safe to do so, as it's non-conductive.

    The unit was never opened before, or if it was, it was opened by Sophos as the security sticker was left intact, however I've noticed several places on the underside of the board that had weird residue, possibly thermal paste of some sort, so that's why I gave it a good cleaning.

    I guess I'll find out, if it stays up over the next few days I will be happy,- it's worth trying Slight smile

  • Just a quick update, it's been almost 24 hours and still up, too early to tell if it's good.

    I opened up my old XG115 r2 and tested the battery, which is older, and to my surprise it was 3.2v ...

    It's also interesting that the old unit has a 2450 vs a 2032, with nearly a double capacity!

  • Unfortunately it went down again, lasted about 24 hours ...

    Oh well, it's a hardware fault after all I guess so nothing I can do Slight smile

  • One more update ...

    I tried with another power supply (higher amperage) but the issue remains.

    However, I have been testing Windows 10 on the unit, as well as performed Intel CPU tests and it passed!
    I am also now running pfSense on the unit, and hopefully I will get some more answers as to what could be happening.

  • Feels good to have gone through this exercise? :)

    Run some prime95 torture tests on it for a few hours.. I'd be surprised if it doesn't lock up sooner than later.

    Has *sense been stable on it? I think their igb drivers are more picky than linux's.

  • I think it feels good, I'm learning more details about what the issue might be Slight smile

    So, the interesting part is that my pfSense is setup in a similar configuration,
    port 1 is WAN, and ports 2,3,4 are just bridged LAN, but so far pfSense has
    not gone down and uptime is at 1 day and 23 hours!

    This is much longer than UTM or SFOS has been able to do, and I've also tried taxing
    the CPU by issuing multiple 'yes > /dev/null &' for each core, and there were no issues.

    So, since I am sure there's other people here on UTM using an XG115 r3 without issues,
    I must be running into a hardware fault that's only exposed by UTM and not pfSense ...

    I don't know how that is possible Slight smile

  • Did you do a prime95 test?