• IPSec HA in 2 different data center

    Farzan Barouj
    Farzan Barouj
    Hi everyone, I have a challenge managing two firewalls (FW1 and FW2) in two different data centers (DC) that are far apart. In DC1, I use FW1 for IPSec tunnels with my clients. I want to add some details: We don't plan to use a FW cluster. We…
    • 10 months ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • SSL VPN

    Andrew English
    Andrew English
    Hi, I have L2TP over IPsec VPN setup on our SG125W firewall and it's not the best as it adds a lot of overhead to the user's connection experience. So searched around on the internet and found this article for setting up SSL VPN using a RAIDUS server;…
    • over 1 year ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • SOPHOS Purposefully Designs bugs into their Firewalls: Episode2 – Email Alerts, Green Statuses, and Routes

    Steve Klassen
    Steve Klassen
    I’m documenting my numerous issues with SOPHOS Firewalls so that others can be aware of what they are getting themselves into. Episode 1 community.sophos.com/.../sophos-purposefully-designs-bugs-into-their-firewalls-episode-1---vpn-failover-and…
    • over 1 year ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • SOPHOS Purposefully Designs bugs into their Firewalls: Episode 1 - VPN Failover and WAN Interfaces

    Steve Klassen
    Steve Klassen
    I’m documenting my numerous issues with SOPHOS Firewalls so that others can be aware of what they are getting themselves into. Our Background: My business is a long time customer of SOPHOS Firewalls(more than 10 years). We have 18 Firewalls and…
    • over 1 year ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • NAT-T not automatically activated in new VPN IPSec tunnel between SG125 and SG230

    admin_drnwag
    admin_drnwag
    Hello community, i got a question related to the NAT Traversal setting in Sophos UTM (9.714-4). I created a new VPN tunnel between an SG125 and an SG230 and the tunnel seems to be up and running fine, according to the webinterface, but i am not able…
    • Answered
    • over 1 year ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • Remote Access via IPSec, Client connected but not receiving packets, not resolved

    MikR
    MikR
    The Problem was first described here : Remote Access via IPSec, Client connected but not receiving packets Currently running Version 9.713-19 of the Sophos UTM 9 SG550 Firewall. Client IPSec version is the latest available : 2.2.75 NAT-Traversal…
    • over 1 year ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • Sophos UTM 9.7 - SG125W

    Andrew English
    Andrew English
    The Sophos VPN client does it only work on SSL or can I use it with L2TP over IPsec? Thanks,
    • over 2 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • L2TP over IPsec DNS problem

    Onur Kaya
    Onur Kaya
    The client can conecct to the VPN from Windows but the problem is even he can ping, can't resolve the domain, anyone seen this before?
    • Answered
    • over 2 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • Remote Access via IPSec, Client connected but not receiving packets

    MikR
    MikR
    Hello, we have a Sophos UTM 9 SG550 running on latest Firmware 9.709-3. We are using Sophos Connect VPN Client version 2.1.20 ( latest ). We have Remote Access IPSec setup but for some reason some clients when connected ( from their Home ) will not…
    • over 2 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • L2TP VPN Stopped Working (encountered processing error during initial negotiations)

    Josh Marchant
    Josh Marchant
    We have an SG230 UTM and we're using L2TP/IPSec VPN to allow remote users to connect to the network. This has been working flawlessly for about 2 years now but we've suddenly started having issues. When trying to connect from Windows clients we get…
    • over 2 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • UTM9 IPsec Setup

    bigneo7
    bigneo7
    Hi, I have UTM9 connected to modem, then modem connect to HQ firewall. How to setup ipsec site-to-site vpn connection using this setup? Branch UTM9: LAN (192.168.12.x) - LAN IP WAN (192.168.0.x) - Local IP of Modem Modem (175.x.x.x) - Public…
    • over 3 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • WiFi Radius over IPSec

    SebK
    SebK
    Hi there, I´m having a hard time understanding some RADIUS authentication issues. For better understanding, a sketch of my setup: We have a UTM with Wireless Protection in the Head Office. We have a running Authentification with RADIUS for some…
    • over 3 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • Outlook and certificate "issue".

    WABGOR_DAVE
    WABGOR_DAVE
    Hello all, As the UTM 9.705-7 we are using was setup by an MSP and at that time we had Exchange 2010, on premise as well. We've since moved to Exchange online and I handle all the Sophos items now. Lately we have random users receiving the following…
    • over 3 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • VPN S2S Azure with UTM9

    MED Trabelsi
    MED Trabelsi
    Hello, I am stuck with my 3 UTM9s installed in 3 sites. I want to configure S2S VPN Azure to UTM9 with Route Policy and it won't pass the connection. Can someone help me to do this configuration on UTM9 side? Does it support Route Policy? It's…
    • over 3 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • Assuring IPSec site-2-site tunnels use a certain WAN interface from Uplink Balancing

    ChrisSoukup
    ChrisSoukup
    I'm currently using Uplink Balancing with one active WAN (WAN1) and one standby WAN (WAN-BAK) interface for failover. I have prepared a WAN2 interface (to another ISP) and would like to add it to active interfaces in order to provide a smooth transition…
    • Answered
    • over 3 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • How to use IPSec User VPN behind NAT

    Brandon Sloan
    Brandon Sloan
    We're having issues being able to connect to our new location's UTM behind our ISP's NAT'd public IP. I was able to get a site-to-site VPN connection working between our New Location and our other location's UTM by setting our other location's UTM to…
    • over 6 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • Why Shrewsoft Tunnel to UTM9 does not complete?

    JT_1234
    JT_1234
    Hello guys I got an strange issue. I needed a long time to complete a configuration between my Sophos UTM9 and my ShrewSoft Client to bring up a tunnel with an X509 certificate. A preshared key is unwanted. Now this is completed with 99%. The problem…
    • over 7 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • IPSec-VPN with NAT

    Luca Bertoncello
    Luca Bertoncello
    Hi all, I just created a new Site-to-Site-VPN with IPSec and the VPN is UP. If I log into my Firewall and try to ping the private IP on the other party, it works, if I try to do that from my PC it does NOT work... The VPN should use two private…
    • over 7 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • Client can't access the server via ipsec vpn even though ipsec is connected.

    YujinWon
    YujinWon
    Hello, I have an issue related to ipsec. Definitely IPSec was not disconnected, but client which was located in BO can't access the server which was located in HO via IPSEC tunnel. PING reached a destination server correctly when client was not able…
    • over 7 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • Routing traffic over a Site to Site VPN for users connecting to main site's SSL VPN?

    GarryGalon1
    GarryGalon1
    OK, here is the deal. I have UTM 9.5s installed at my main office, and a branch office. The Site 2 Site VPN between the 2 offices is an IPsec VPN. Main office has static IP, branch office is Dynamic. I have all that sorted out and working fine. I can…
    • over 7 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • IPSec Site2Site VPN Using Cisco C2800/C2900 and SG115 can't communicate eachother.

    聡 中村
    聡 中村
    Hi I setup Site-to-site VPN by IPSec using C2821 and SG115. It looks like to be connected from looking Site-to-site VPN Tunnel Status. but, it can't response by ping ,eachother. And ,this situation is reproducted when using C2921 instead of C2821. …
    • over 7 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • Radius over IPSec Site-to-Site

    Mike Siconolfi
    Mike Siconolfi
    Hello, I've been bashing my head against this issue for a few days and finally need to ask for some help. I have a network created in AWS which uses a Sophos UTM for all connections into the VPC. I'm not using the AWS VPN Tunnel for VPC. The Sophos…
    • over 7 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • Issue of MSS on IPSEC VPN

    YujinWon
    YujinWon
    I have SG devices on the Head office and branch office. And two devices are connected using IPSEC VPN tunnel. All traffic including internet traffic from the branch office is going out through Head office. That means IPSEC VPN full tunnel. There was…
    • over 7 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • IPSec VPN does not work for IOS devices after upgrade to 9.411-3

    Jesper Hanno Hansen
    Jesper Hanno Hansen
    After upgrading to 9.411-3 IOS devices cannot connect via IPSec, if the configuration on the ISO device is deleted and configured again via remote access it works, but we dont like to bother our users reinstalling the VPN configuration... is there a way…
    • over 7 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • Issues with VPN tunnels after newest firmware update

    JustinSetterlund
    JustinSetterlund
    Hi, I have several UTM's last night that I updated to the latest firmware (9.409009) 3 of them are having issues with the IPsec VPN tunnels after the upgrade. It'll show the tunnels as being connected, but can't pass any traffic, ping, etc. They were…
    • over 7 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • View related content throughout UTM Firewall
  • More
  • Cancel
>