• Nessus Scan (CRITICAL/HIGH/HIGH) - Apache 2.4.x < 2.4.56 Multiple Vulnerabilities

    Tim Badaczewski
    Tim Badaczewski
    I'm getting one CRITICAL and two HIGH finding related to the version of Apache that Sophos is running. Is Sophos UTM 9 going to get an upgrade version of Apache anytime soon to clear these? Is there a safe way for me to upgrade myself? Here are the CVE…
    • Answered
    • over 1 year ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • UTM on AWS
  • SSL3.0 TLS1.0 for Port 3400

    raywo
    raywo
    Hi, I did a vulnerability scan of my external IP and in the results I can see that SSL3.0 TLS1.1 and TLS1.1 are still supported for Port 3400. I guess this was already asked before but I didn't find it in the forum. Is there already a solution for…
    • Answered
    • over 3 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • Remote Ethernet Device (RED)
  • Confirmation for Compliancy

    rost_opengi
    rost_opengi
    Hello, We have PCI compliancy organisation requesting information/documentation on whether Sophos UTM is vulnerable to a range of CVE's based on detecting version of the Exim component. Some of the CVE's information as asked already, however we haven…
    • Answered
    • over 3 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • OpenSSL null pointer reference issue (CVE-2020-1971)

    EdmundSackbauer
    EdmundSackbauer
    There is a vulnerability in OpenSSL: https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20201208.txt It could be used for a denial-of-service attack openSSL has it already fixed, when will it be included into UTM (and XG)? BR Edmund
    • over 3 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • General Discussion
  • Snort Vulnerability affect UTM IPS??

    EricShulze
    EricShulze
    Does anyone know what version of Snort the IPS uses? Snort/Cisco just had a vulnerability posted: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/03/31/cisco_snort_scramble_to_plug_malware_hole/ Just wondering if the UTM's are exposed as well??
    • over 8 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • Network Protection: Firewall, NAT, QoS, & IPS
  • How to pass PCI Compliance scan when RED (tcp/3400) uses a weak cipher?

    JonZgoda
    JonZgoda
    Our recent PCI Compliance scan came back failed because the RED service uses RC4-SHA. This is also one of the issues that the scanning company (Trustwave, who is used by our credit card processor, FirstData) will not allow to be overridden. If this is…
    • Answered
    • over 8 years ago
    • UTM Firewall
    • Remote Ethernet Device (RED)
  • View related content from anywhere
  • More
  • Cancel