Hi all,
I have customers who have mail server who doesn't accept any other security than LOGIN with authenticated SMTP, XG Firewall doesn't do that even if security is set to none.
Best regards,
Benoit
Hi all,
I have customers who have mail server who doesn't accept any other security than LOGIN with authenticated SMTP, XG Firewall doesn't do that even if security is set to none.
Best regards,
Benoit
Hi,
I have been testing that for awhile and came to the conclusion if using port 587 you need security settings enabled at least on the XG implementation. For what you are trying to achieve you should be using port 25.
Here is a quote about port 587 you might find helpful.
stackoverflow.com/.../what-is-the-difference-between-ports-465-and-587
Ian
XG115W - v20.0.2 MR-2 - Home
XG on VM 8 - v21 GA
If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.
I have read your link but nothing force to use starttls on 587. And UTM v9 is working great with the same configuration.
I have read your link but nothing force to use starttls on 587. And UTM v9 is working great with the same configuration.
I can't test the utm anymore, I killed it to build an XG v17b box.
I was using relay for both notifications and users with authentication.
Ian
XG115W - v20.0.2 MR-2 - Home
XG on VM 8 - v21 GA
If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.
Hi,
Thank you for the SFOS v17 feedback
Need debug logs for the same.
Run command
Test the mail
/log/csc.log /log/cschelper.log
Hi,
Sorry for the time to respond.
You can find the files here : dl.provectio.fr/.../ebc426
You could see in cschelper.log that UTM try to authenticate with CRAM-MD5 and my server allow LOGIN only.
Best regards,
Benoit LORAND