Thread Info
  • Replies 3 replies
  • Subscribers 2 subscribers
  • Views 389 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested

Port Forwarding - Changed Destination Port greyed out when mixing TCP/UDP/ICMP in Services field

MattyG

version: (SFOS 17.0.0 Beta-1)

 

When creating a Business Rule DNAT template i have found that, when mixing TCP/UDP/ICMP protocols in the services fieldthe option for re-mapping ports:

1. Remapping option is greyed out and not possible to change the port

2. only possible to do remapping when using a single Protocol. eg TCP only or UDP only.

 

Is this a known limitation, that will be fixed in a future release?

 

 

 

Matt G - Bluechip IT

Parents

  • Matt,

    I saw this behaviour too few days ago. How can the firewall understand which service must be changed to another one?

    In order to improve this aspect a one to one relation is required and I guess a the moment XG is not able to handle it.

  • in reply to lferrara

    Whats available in Beta 1 is a good step forward, at least a basic portforward (no port changes) can now be done in a single rule

    Maybe they could either:

    1. have 2 mapped port boxes for TCP and UDP ports and then inside those list the ports in csv order.

    2. have a mapped port boxes for each port forwarded TCP/UDP allowing control over each port with its own box.

     

    Matt G - Bluechip IT.

Reply
  • in reply to lferrara

    Whats available in Beta 1 is a good step forward, at least a basic portforward (no port changes) can now be done in a single rule

    Maybe they could either:

    1. have 2 mapped port boxes for TCP and UDP ports and then inside those list the ports in csv order.

    2. have a mapped port boxes for each port forwarded TCP/UDP allowing control over each port with its own box.

     

    Matt G - Bluechip IT.

Children
Unfiltered HTML