I have this rule
And this is what the log looks like, the entire log doesn't fit but there is not a single droped connection on it. Why is this? Is a bug or what is the problem?
This thread was automatically locked due to age.
I have this rule
And this is what the log looks like, the entire log doesn't fit but there is not a single droped connection on it. Why is this? Is a bug or what is the problem?
Traffic is allowed in a previous rule, and it works.
I don't understand drop and reject rules doesn't have DNAT rules associated.
This is the detail of rule 8.
This has nothing to do with device access I'm not publishing https admin interface
So how are those logs related to firewal rule 23?
Those logs are incoming, from internet to my public IP, but for some reason the out interface is missing.
This is how it should looks like with a previous rule I had, it was a reject rule, I change it to drop and then it started to show allowed connections, then I cloned it.. same behaviour It shows allowed connections
Its a known behavior, which will be adjusted in the future releases.
The Reject/Drop Rule will forward the HTTP/s traffic to the proxy to drop this traffic. This is what you see, the Traffic will be forwarded to the proxy, the proxy will drop the traffic. Reference: NC-64820
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Just to be sure: docs.sophos.com/.../index.html
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________