Scheduled maintenance on Saturday, August 8th from 7am to 10am (UTC). Licensing registrations and key activations will be unavailable during this period. More info here.
We'd love to hear about it! Click here to go to the product suggestion community
I continue to dislike the XG methodology compared to the UTM 9.x but, nonetheless, i have deployed these XG125 units and enabled STAS according to the instructions, all seems to be working, EXCEPT, that the single Domain Controller i have at 192.168.35.6 where the STAS Agent is running and configured properly and Audit Logons and Logoffs is setup, etc. No matter what i do, try test, the Administrator when they login will reflect in the XG "Live Users" list as
email@example.com 192.168.35.1 <----WTH is this? When I login to the DC where the STAS is setup and running, it reflects on the XG this way instead of 192.168.35.6 where the DC actually is located.
I hope Sophos realizes that they either need to implement the method used by UTM9.x in some form or fashion or shine this terrible STAT method up. There is just too much troubleshooting to get this working in a brand new environment.
You could go with Kerberos if you want?
V18 supports the UTM Kerberos in Web proxy.
In reply to LuCar Toni:
Yeah, not a bad idea, i probably need to go back to these XG v17 and get them up v18.
PS: Did you exclude the Administrator to be fetch to begin with?
Which IP is 192.168.35.1? Do not forget, RDP session generate multiple Login events on the current client as well as on the Client, you are connecting to.