This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Site-to-Site RED tunnel not working

Hi,

I'm having the hardest time setting up a Site-to-Site RED tunnel between two SG230 appliances.

I'm trying to establish a tunnel between our main site (subnet 10.0.0.0/16) and our remote site (subnet 10.3.0.0/16).

I was following the steps from the tutotial located at

https://community.sophos.com/kb/en-us/120157

and was able to get the RED-tunnel up.

However, setting the static routes as described in the howto does not work unfortunately, no traffic seems to pass between both UTMs.

I've defined the reds2 Interface on the main site UTM with the ip adress 192.168.200.1 (We have another RED tunnel to a RED15 appliance at another branch Office, which is why the server Interface is named reds2) and the redc1 Interface on the remote site with the ip adress 192.168.200.2.

At this Point, shouldn't I be able to ping both RED endpoints from either UTM? At the Moment, I'm unable to get any pings across.

Any help would be appreciated!

Dominik



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • Hi Dominik,

    To my knowledge, once a tunnel is setup, traffic between two UTMs becomes purely a matter of routing and firewall rules. Can you verify that you configured RED (Network) in the Gateway route definition instead of RED (Address).

    Thanks

    Sachin Gurung
    Team Lead | Sophos Technical Support
    Knowledge Base  |  @SophosSupport  |  Video tutorials
    Remember to like a post.  If a post (on a question thread) solves your question use the 'This helped me' link.

  • Hi,

    thanks for answering!

    I'm pretty sure it had something to do with routing, but I couldn't get it to work.

    I decided to scratch the RED setup and instead, went ahead and established a SSL-VPN Site-to-Site tunnel...lo and behold, everything worked right from the get-go.

    So I couldn't solve the original problem, but since Sohps UTM is crazy flexible you usually find a solution that works [:)]

    Thanks anyway!

  • Hi Bob,

    i tryied masq also like Semily subnet -> LAN and Semily subnet -> local RED interface...

    Nothing...

    Tracing route to 10.10.1.56 over a maximum of 30 hops

      1     2 ms     1 ms     3 ms  192.168.6.1
      2     *        *        *     Request timed out.
      3     *        *        *     Request timed out.

  • You're using different network objects in the routes and firewall rules.  Is the problem that you need two firewall rules for traffic from the LAN to the remote subnet: one in the server side allowing traffic from the LAN to the remote subnet and one on the client that allows traffic from the server-side LAN to the client-side subnet.  In fact, before you do that, you should see blocks in the Firewall Live Log if this is the problem.

    If you still haven't solved the problem, Please make a diagram for us, including IPs and subnets.

    Cheers - Bob

     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
  • I tryied so many combinations in firewall rules that i almost cant count them all.

    Im going to draw a diagram, by hand, ill post it in few minutes...

  • From UTM Client Tools im able to ping server 10.10.1.56 on RED 50 site...

    Also im able to ping 10.30.1.1

    but from client behind Client UTM im able to ping only 10.30.1.2, nothing else...

  • Vitek, I think my last comment about firewall rules was right.  I'll just use the numeric subnets as the network objects will have different names in each UTM:

    RED Client UTM:

    1. 192.168.6.0/24 -> Any&Ping -> 10.10.1.0/24 : Allow
    2. 10.10.1.0/24 -> Any&Ping -> 192.168.6.0/24 : Allow
    3. Gateway Route 10.10.1.0/24 via 10.30.1.1

    RED Server UTM:

    1. 192.168.6.0/24 -> Any&Ping -> 10.10.1.0/24 : Allow
    2. 10.10.1.0/24 -> Any&Ping -> 192.168.6.0/24 : Allow
    3. Gateway Route 192.168.6.0/24 via 10.30.1.2

    Any better luck now?

    Cheers - Bob

     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
  • No...:-(

    Posting screenshots, tryied single FW rules as you mentioned, also combined rule as on screenshot...

    Client (192.168.6.0/24)

     

    Server

    One more thing...Tested from 3 PCs to avoid routing problems in client PC...

  • And there are no drops in the firewall or Intrusion Prevention log?  Are there any other static routes in place that might conflict with these - anything curious in the routing table on either UTM?

    Cheers - Bob

     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
  • Firewall is clear, no drops on those subnets, IPS is disabled on both sides.

    No other static routes, no policy routes, only standard internal routing and BGP routing, in BGP there is no conflicting subnet with any of subnets im using.

    If somebody want, we can do teamviewer session, or should i contact sophos support?

  • "IPS is disabled on both sides." - Sometimes, the problem is with UDP Anti-Flooding activity, and that's in the IPS log.  I don't expect that to be the issue, but it never hurts to look.

    Cheers - Bob

     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
  • Enabled IPS to be able to look into Live log...also nothing... :-(

Reply Children
No Data