Thread Info
  • State Suggested Answer
  • +9 person also asked this people also asked this
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 35 replies
  • Answers 3 answers
  • Subscribers 21 subscribers
  • Views 146053 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Updating to 9.506 - Broke HA cluster

Anth

Hi all,

On Friday I patched our Sophos UTM cluster to 9.506 and found that the cluster is broken unless the passive node is switched off. The VM's are on the same ESX host and I have checked that they both have Virtual mac setting set to 0. Has anyone noticed this also and have a work around?

Cheers

Anthony 



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0

    Hi,

     

    we have the same problem with some virtual UTM clusters in the company.

    We run the utm clusters over different esx hosts. Other systems which run on the same esx host together with the utm slave node can't access the utm cluster.

    Our temp. solution is to run master and slave utm node on the same esx host.

    We opened a sophos ticket and get a confirmation, that this is a bug.

    This will be fixed in next version 9.508, but we dont get an release date.

     

    Br Erik

Reply
  • 0

    Hi,

     

    we have the same problem with some virtual UTM clusters in the company.

    We run the utm clusters over different esx hosts. Other systems which run on the same esx host together with the utm slave node can't access the utm cluster.

    Our temp. solution is to run master and slave utm node on the same esx host.

    We opened a sophos ticket and get a confirmation, that this is a bug.

    This will be fixed in next version 9.508, but we dont get an release date.

     

    Br Erik

Children
No Data
Unfiltered HTML